Water is a natural substantive element not only for life, but also for guaranteeing
people's dignity (Aragón and Arrojo, 2018). It is essential for health, a healthy environment, decent housing, children's
higher rights, the rights of indigenous peoples, the right to development, education,
science, citizen participation and many other human rights (Human Rights) (Rojas-Rueda, 2020). Despite
this wide interrelationship between water and various human rights, it is common to hear that it is mainly associated with
two human rights: water and sanitation (Wilder, Martínez, Hernández, & Cruz, 2020).
Human rights to water
and sanitation are of recent recognition. In 2002, derived from General Comment No. 15 of the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural
Rights, the human right to water was recognized for the first time (United
Nations, Economic and Social Council, 2002); in July 2010, the General Assembly of the United
Nations recognized the human right to water and sanitation (United Nations, General Assembly, 2010); and, in 2012, the Political Constitution of
the United Mexican States (CPEUM) incorporated them into its fourth article (Official Journal
of the Federation, 2012).
Originally, these rights were integrated as a single
human right, but over time they became distant, to a large extent, derived from the work carried out by the
first two special rapporteurs on human rights to water and sanitation of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human
Rights (OHCHR), Catarina de Albuquerque and Leo Heller (Heller, 2017).
Today, both rights are
recognized as independent human rights with clear verifiable differences in the dimensions that characterize them:
sufficiency, affordability, accessibility and security (quality). This determines, among other things, that for its
full exercise, different measures and the participation of different authorities are required.
When
talking about water, human rights and public policies, it is important to consider the obligated subjects: the
authorities.
However, human rights are the prerogatives of all people and, when thinking of communities,
also of communities (not companies or government institutions). The obligation to
comply does not belong to individuals or market actors, but is the exclusive responsibility of
the authorities, who therefore have obligations in the area of human rights (Ávila-García, 2020; CNDH, 2020). Hence,
the authorities, as actors in the sphere of government, are of particular relevance in achieving the
fulfillment of these rights (Anglés, 2016).
This is reinforced in the Mexican case, with the
incorporation in 2011 into the first article of the CPEUM, the recognition of the State's
obligations in the area of human rights: to promote, respect, protect and guarantee human rights (Official Journal of the Federation, 2011).
For all these reasons, since 2011, at least in Mexico, one cannot think about public policies without
incorporating the human rights approach (Giménez, 2010; SEGOB, 2014). Water matter is no exception.
Now,
when we think about public policies, we seek attention to problems of public interest. This implies
finding mechanisms to monitor progress in achieving the objectives of such public policies.
Information translated into indicators allows us to know the state of the problem and the effectiveness or not of the policies
(United Nations, 2012). Thus, indicators become a substantial element for
transparency and accountability processes, in addition to allowing timely changes to be made in the design of policies
when the desired effects are not achieved.
If we think of this in human rights language, then when designing
these indicators, we should consider an approach that verifies compliance with the State's obligations in the area
of human rights, which implies not only changing the way we present information, but also the way we think about the indicators (United Nations, 2012).
In the case of human rights to water and sanitation, indicators associated with coverage or infrastructure are
traditionally used, which after knowing the
dimensions of these two rights, are limited in verifying their compliance.
Water policies
must be designed in the language of rights, focusing on ensuring that the State is able to fulfill those obligations. New international
obligations, such as those that will result from the Regional Agreement on Access to Information, Public
Participation and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters in Latin America and the Caribbean, also
known as the Escazú Agreement (ECLAC, 2018), will imply having baselines and mechanisms to verify compliance.
Thus, human rights compliance indicators will be of great help for this purpose.
Currently, the Ministry of the Interior coordinates the National System for the Assessment of the Level of
Compliance with Human Rights, through a platform (https://snedh.segob.gob.mx/) that allows any
person or decision maker to know the status of the rights included therein. Unfortunately, as of
today, human rights to water and sanitation are not included in this platform.
At the IMTA, in
collaboration with the OHCHR office in Mexico, we are developing indicators to assess the level of human rights
compliance with water and sanitation for Mexico, which will also be the first of their kind on a global scale.
Notes:
Anglés, M. (2016). Water and Human Rights (First ed.). CNDH. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/28694756/Agua_y_derechos_humanos
Aragón, V., & Arrojo, P.
(2018). The ideology of water in Spain; dismantling the discourse. Ibero-American Journal of Ecological Economics,
28, 37-51.
Avila-Garcia, P. (2020). Human Right to Water and Environmental Justice: Reflections on the Role of the
State and Society. In O. G. Hernández, & A. R. Alvarado, we need a water law to guarantee human
rights in Mexico (First ed., p. 177). Toluca: UAEM.
ECLAC. (2018). Regional Agreement on Access
to Information, Public Participation and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters in Latin America and the
Caribbean. Santiago, Chile: United Nations. Retrieved from https://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/43595/1/S1800429_es.pdf
CNDH.
(2020). Recommendation No. 1/2020 on violations of the Human Right to Water to the detriment of the
general population and farmers of the Mexicali Valley, resulting from acts and omissions in various procedures and procedures.
Mexico: CNDH.
National Water Commission. (2014). National Water Program. 2014-2018.
Mexico: CONAGUA.
Official Gazette of the Federation. (2011). DECREE amending the name of
Chapter I of Title I and amending several articles of the CPEUM. Mexico: DOF. Obtained from http://www.diputados.gob.mx/LeyesBiblio/ref/dof/CPEUM_ref_194_10jun11.pdf Official
Gazette
of the Federation. (08 of 02, 2012). DECREE declaring the fifth paragraph amended and adding a sixth
paragraph, following subsequent orders, to article 4 of the Political Constitution of the United Mexican States.
Retrieved from http://dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle.php?codigo=5232952&fecha=08/02/2012
Ferrer, E., &
Pelayo, C.M. (2012). THE OBLIGATION TO “RESPECT” AND “GUARANTEE” HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE LIGHT OF THE
JURISPRUDENCE OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT: Analysis of Article 1 of the San José Pact as a conventional
source of Mexican constitutional procedural law. Constitutional Studies, 10 (2), 141-192.
Gimenez, C. (2010). The
approach to human rights in public policies: ideas for a budding debate. CENDES notebooks,
27 (74), 51-80.
Gutierrez, R. (2008). The fundamental right to water in Mexico; an instrument of protection
for people and ecosystems. Constitutional Issues Mexican Review of Constitutional Law, 1 (18),
71-90.
Heller, L. (2017). Final mission statement of the Special Rapporteur on the human rights to water and
sanitation Mr. Leo Heller. Mexico: Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights
in Mexico. Retrieved from https://www.hchr.org.mx/index.php?option=com_k2&view=item&id=967:declaracion-de-final-de-mision-del-relator-especial-sobre-los-derechos-humanos-al-agua-y-al-saneamiento-sr-leo-heller&Itemid=281
United
Nations. (2011). The right to water. Information Leaflet No. 35 (First ed.). Geneva: Office of the United Nations High
Commissioner for Human Rights.
United Nations. (2012). Indicators on the
Right to Water in Mexico Vol.1 (1st ed.). Mexico: Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human
Rights, CEMDA A.C.
United Nations, General Assembly. (2010). Resolution adopted by the
General Assembly on July 28, 2010. 64/292. The human right to water and sanitation. New York: United Nations.
Retrieved from https://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/64/292&Lang=S
United Nations, Economic and Social
Council. (2002). General Comment No. 15 The right to water (articles 11 and 12 of the
International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights). Geneva: Committee on Economic, Social and
Cultural Rights.
Network on Rights. (2011). Human rights-based approach: evaluation and indicators. NI:
AECID/ISI Argonaut.
Rojas-Rueda, A. (2020). Towards a General Water Law,. (UAM-Xochimilco, Ed.) Arguments,
critical studies of society.
SEGOB, S.A. (2014). Manual and Protocol for the elaboration of public policies
on Human Rights in accordance with the new Constitutional Principles. Retrieved on September 20, 2020, from http://segob.gob.mx/work/models/SEGOB/Resource/1093/8/images/Manual_politica_publica_dh.pdf
Wilder,
M., Martínez, P. F., Hernández, P., & Cruz, M. B. (2020). The human right to water in Mexico: Challenges and
opportunities. Water alternatives, 13 (1), 28-48.
Comentarios (0)